Skip to main content

Amberley vs Edens Landing

Property investment comparison - Amberley, QLD 4306 vs Edens Landing, QLD 4207

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Amberley wins 4, Edens Landing wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAmberleyEdens Landing
Median house price$910K$910K
Median unit price$610K$685K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.02%3.76%
Gross rental yield (units)4.31%3.94%
1-year house growth-+16.1%
3-year house growth-+46.9%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.6%
Population6195,094

Amberley vs Edens Landing: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $910K in Amberley and $910K in Edens Landing.

For units, Amberley sits at a median of $610K against $685K in Edens Landing, which makes Amberley the more affordable unit market and Edens Landing the pricier one.

On cash flow, Amberley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.02%, compared with 3.76% in Edens Landing, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Amberley and 1.6% in Edens Landing, so landlords in Amberley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Edens Landing is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,094 against 619, roughly 8 times the size of Amberley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Amberley for rental income, Amberley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison