Skip to main content

Appin vs Kurrajong Heights

Property investment comparison - Appin, NSW 2560 vs Kurrajong Heights, NSW 2758

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Appin wins 2, Kurrajong Heights wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAppinKurrajong Heights
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$3.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.70%3.24%
Gross rental yield (units)3.03%-
1-year house growth+9.8%estimate+7.9%
3-year house growth-+27.1%
Vacancy rate3.5%8.5%
Population3,2131,255

Appin vs Kurrajong Heights: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Appin and $1.2M in Kurrajong Heights.

On cash flow, Kurrajong Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.24%, compared with 2.70% in Appin, a gap of 0.54 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.8% in Appin (an estimate) and +7.9% in Kurrajong Heights, so recent momentum favours Appin, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 3.5% in Appin and 8.5% in Kurrajong Heights, so landlords in Appin face less competition for tenants.

Appin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,213 against 1,255, roughly 2.6 times the size of Kurrajong Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kurrajong Heights for rental income, Appin for recent price momentum, Appin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison