Skip to main content

Ashmont vs Collingullie

Property investment comparison - Ashmont, NSW 2650 vs Collingullie, NSW 2650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ashmont wins 0, Collingullie wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAshmontCollingullie
Median house price$540K$540K
Median unit price$385K$380K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.60%5.20%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.94%
1-year house growth+15.6%-
3-year house growth+41.9%-
Vacancy rate2.6%1.2%
Population3,747258

Ashmont vs Collingullie: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $540K in Ashmont and $540K in Collingullie.

For units, Ashmont sits at a median of $385K against $380K in Collingullie, which makes Collingullie the more affordable unit market and Ashmont the pricier one.

On cash flow, Collingullie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.20%, compared with 4.60% in Ashmont, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Collingullie and 2.6% in Ashmont, so landlords in Collingullie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ashmont is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,747 against 258, roughly 15 times the size of Collingullie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Collingullie for rental income, Collingullie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison