Skip to main content

Aubin Grove vs Kinross

Property investment comparison - Aubin Grove, WA 6164 vs Kinross, WA 6028

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aubin Grove wins 3, Kinross wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAubin GroveKinross
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.03%4.08%
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%4.60%
1-year house growth+13.5%+22.9%
3-year house growth+69.0%+60.0%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.4%
Population6,7866,988

Aubin Grove vs Kinross: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Aubin Grove and $1.0M in Kinross, so Aubin Grove is the cheaper entry point.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.03% in Aubin Grove and 4.08% in Kinross, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.5% in Aubin Grove and +22.9% in Kinross, so recent momentum favours Kinross, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aubin Grove houses are +69.0% and Kinross houses +60.0%, so Aubin Grove has compounded faster than Kinross over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Kinross and 1.6% in Aubin Grove, so landlords in Kinross face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kinross is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,988 against 6,786, larger than Aubin Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aubin Grove for a lower purchase price, Kinross for recent price momentum, Kinross for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison