Skip to main content

Aubin Grove vs Stoneville

Property investment comparison - Aubin Grove, WA 6164 vs Stoneville, WA 6081

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aubin Grove wins 2, Stoneville wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAubin GroveStoneville
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price-$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.03%2.93%
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%2.52%
1-year house growth+13.5%+15.8%estimate
3-year house growth+69.0%-
Vacancy rate1.6%1.4%
Population6,7862,489

Aubin Grove vs Stoneville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Aubin Grove and $1.0M in Stoneville, so Stoneville is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Aubin Grove leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.03%, compared with 2.93% in Stoneville, a gap of 1.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.5% in Aubin Grove and +15.8% in Stoneville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Stoneville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Stoneville and 1.6% in Aubin Grove, so landlords in Stoneville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aubin Grove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,786 against 2,489, roughly 2.7 times the size of Stoneville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aubin Grove for rental income, Stoneville for a lower purchase price, Stoneville for recent price momentum, Stoneville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison