Skip to main content

Ballina vs Laguna

Property investment comparison - Ballina, NSW 2478 vs Laguna, NSW 2325

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ballina wins 3, Laguna wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBallinaLaguna
Median house price$960K$960K
Median unit price$730K$465K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.32%2.84%
Gross rental yield (units)4.25%5.83%
1-year house growth+5.8%+4.6%estimate
3-year house growth+17.6%-
Vacancy rate0.4%7.6%
Population9,735310

Ballina vs Laguna: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $960K in Ballina and $960K in Laguna.

For units, Ballina sits at a median of $730K against $465K in Laguna, which makes Laguna the more affordable unit market and Ballina the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ballina leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.32%, compared with 2.84% in Laguna, a gap of 1.48 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.8% in Ballina and +4.6% in Laguna (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ballina, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Ballina and 7.6% in Laguna, so landlords in Ballina face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ballina is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,735 against 310, roughly 31 times the size of Laguna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ballina for rental income, Ballina for recent price momentum, Ballina for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison