Bargo vs Colyton
Property investment comparison - Bargo, NSW 2574 vs Colyton, NSW 2760
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bargo wins 3, Colyton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bargo | Colyton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.08% | 2.83% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.32% | 3.33% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.2% | +11.9%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +22.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 2.7% |
| Population | 4,516 | 8,770 |
Bargo vs Colyton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Bargo and $1.1M in Colyton.
On cash flow, Bargo leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.08%, compared with 2.83% in Colyton, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Bargo and +11.9% in Colyton (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Colyton, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Bargo and 2.7% in Colyton, so landlords in Bargo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Colyton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,770 against 4,516, larger than Bargo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bargo for rental income, Colyton for recent price momentum, Bargo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison