Skip to main content

Barnsley vs Batemans Bay

Property investment comparison - Barnsley, NSW 2278 vs Batemans Bay, NSW 2536

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barnsley wins 3, Batemans Bay wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBarnsleyBatemans Bay
Median house price$810K$810K
Median unit price$685K$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%3.92%
Gross rental yield (units)5.18%-
1-year house growth+11.8%+1.4%
3-year house growth+22.6%-
Vacancy rate0.8%1.1%
Population1,7351,573

Barnsley vs Batemans Bay: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $810K in Barnsley and $810K in Batemans Bay.

For units, Barnsley sits at a median of $685K against $555K in Batemans Bay, which makes Batemans Bay the more affordable unit market and Barnsley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Barnsley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 3.92% in Batemans Bay, a gap of 0.48 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.8% in Barnsley and +1.4% in Batemans Bay, so recent momentum favours Barnsley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Barnsley and 1.1% in Batemans Bay, so landlords in Barnsley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Barnsley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,735 against 1,573, larger than Batemans Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Barnsley for rental income, Barnsley for recent price momentum, Barnsley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison