Skip to main content

Bathurst vs Dubbo

Property investment comparison - Bathurst, NSW 2795 vs Dubbo, NSW 2830

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bathurst wins 2, Dubbo wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBathurstDubbo
Median house price$690K$680K
Median unit price$490K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.22%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)4.57%-
1-year house growth+5.7%+20.5%
3-year house growth+11.1%+9.9%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.6%
Population7,00143,516

Bathurst vs Dubbo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $690K in Bathurst and $680K in Dubbo, so Dubbo is the cheaper entry point, with Bathurst houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Dubbo leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 4.22% in Bathurst, a gap of 0.18 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.7% in Bathurst and +20.5% in Dubbo, so recent momentum favours Dubbo, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bathurst houses are +11.1% and Dubbo houses +9.9%, so Bathurst has compounded faster than Dubbo over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Bathurst and 1.6% in Dubbo, so landlords in Bathurst face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dubbo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 43,516 against 7,001, roughly 6 times the size of Bathurst; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dubbo for rental income, Dubbo for a lower purchase price, Dubbo for recent price momentum, Bathurst for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison