Skip to main content

Beachmere vs Redlynch

Property investment comparison - Beachmere, QLD 4510 vs Redlynch, QLD 4870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beachmere wins 2, Redlynch wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeachmereRedlynch
Median house price$920K$920K
Median unit price-$545K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%4.51%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.60%
1-year house growth+14.9%+16.9%
3-year house growth+49.6%+34.2%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.4%
Population4,78210,571

Beachmere vs Redlynch: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $920K in Beachmere and $920K in Redlynch.

On cash flow, Redlynch leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.51%, compared with 3.80% in Beachmere, a gap of 0.71 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Beachmere and +16.9% in Redlynch, so recent momentum favours Redlynch, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Beachmere houses are +49.6% and Redlynch houses +34.2%, so Beachmere has compounded faster than Redlynch over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Beachmere and 1.4% in Redlynch, so landlords in Beachmere face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Redlynch is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,571 against 4,782, roughly 2.2 times the size of Beachmere; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Redlynch for rental income, Redlynch for recent price momentum, Beachmere for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison