Skip to main content

Belmore vs Kogarah

Property investment comparison - Belmore, NSW 2192 vs Kogarah, NSW 2217

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Belmore wins 2, Kogarah wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBelmoreKogarah
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$665K$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.40%2.46%
Gross rental yield (units)4.70%5.02%
1-year house growth+5.4%estimate+5.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%0.8%
Population13,78116,416

Belmore vs Kogarah: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Belmore and $1.9M in Kogarah, so Belmore is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Belmore sits at a median of $665K against $745K in Kogarah, which makes Belmore the more affordable unit market and Kogarah the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kogarah leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 2.40% in Belmore, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.4% in Belmore (an estimate) and +5.9% in Kogarah (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kogarah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Kogarah and 1.1% in Belmore, so landlords in Kogarah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kogarah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,416 against 13,781, larger than Belmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kogarah for rental income, Belmore for a lower purchase price, Kogarah for recent price momentum, Kogarah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison