Belmunda vs Queenton
Property investment comparison - Belmunda, QLD 4740 vs Queenton, QLD 4820
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Belmunda wins 0, Queenton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Belmunda | Queenton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $345K | $345K |
| Median unit price | - | $455K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 6.19% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.03% |
| 1-year house growth | -10.5% | +16.9%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 0.4% |
| Population | 6 | 1,236 |
Belmunda vs Queenton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $345K in Belmunda and $345K in Queenton.
Over the past year house prices moved -10.5% in Belmunda and +16.9% in Queenton (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Queenton, while Belmunda went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Queenton and 1.9% in Belmunda, so landlords in Queenton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Queenton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,236 against 6, roughly 206 times the size of Belmunda; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Queenton for recent price momentum, Queenton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison