Belmunda vs St George
Property investment comparison - Belmunda, QLD 4740 vs St George, QLD 4487
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Belmunda wins 1, St George wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Belmunda | St George |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $345K | $360K |
| Median unit price | - | $220K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 5.74% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 6.77% |
| 1-year house growth | -10.5% | +23.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +34.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| Population | 6 | 3,130 |
Belmunda vs St George: what the numbers say
The median house price is $345K in Belmunda and $360K in St George, so Belmunda is the cheaper entry point, with St George houses about 4% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved -10.5% in Belmunda and +23.3% in St George, so recent momentum favours St George, while Belmunda went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 0.0% in St George and 1.9% in Belmunda, so landlords in St George face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
St George is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,130 against 6, roughly 522 times the size of Belmunda; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Belmunda for a lower purchase price, St George for recent price momentum, St George for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison