Skip to main content

Bethania vs Collingwood Park

Property investment comparison - Bethania, QLD 4205 vs Collingwood Park, QLD 4301

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bethania wins 2, Collingwood Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBethaniaCollingwood Park
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price-$615K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.55%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.20%
1-year house growth+21.5%estimate+19.2%
3-year house growth-+55.9%
Vacancy rate0.8%2.1%
Population6,3339,246

Bethania vs Collingwood Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Bethania and $900K in Collingwood Park.

On cash flow, Collingwood Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.55% in Bethania, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.5% in Bethania (an estimate) and +19.2% in Collingwood Park, so recent momentum favours Bethania, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Bethania and 2.1% in Collingwood Park, so landlords in Bethania face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Collingwood Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,246 against 6,333, larger than Bethania; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Collingwood Park for rental income, Bethania for recent price momentum, Bethania for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison