Beverford vs Herne Hill
Property investment comparison - Beverford, VIC 3590 vs Herne Hill, VIC 3218
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beverford wins 0, Herne Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Beverford | Herne Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810K | $810K |
| Median unit price | $250K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.53% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +2.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +13.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 4.8% | 2.2% |
| Population | 337 | 3,507 |
Beverford vs Herne Hill: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $810K in Beverford and $810K in Herne Hill.
Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Herne Hill and 4.8% in Beverford, so landlords in Herne Hill face less competition for tenants.
Herne Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,507 against 337, roughly 10 times the size of Beverford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Herne Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison