Beverford vs Narre Warren
Property investment comparison - Beverford, VIC 3590 vs Narre Warren, VIC 3805
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beverford wins 1, Narre Warren wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Beverford | Narre Warren |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $810K | $810K |
| Median unit price | $250K | $620K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.75% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.44% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +6.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +10.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 4.8% | 1.7% |
| Population | 337 | 27,689 |
Beverford vs Narre Warren: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $810K in Beverford and $810K in Narre Warren.
For units, Beverford sits at a median of $250K against $620K in Narre Warren, which makes Beverford the more affordable unit market and Narre Warren the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Narre Warren and 4.8% in Beverford, so landlords in Narre Warren face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Narre Warren is the bigger suburb, with a population of 27,689 against 337, roughly 82 times the size of Beverford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Narre Warren for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison