Skip to main content

Beverley vs Chiton

Property investment comparison - Beverley, SA 5009 vs Chiton, SA 5211

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beverley wins 2, Chiton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeverleyChiton
Median house price$1.0M$990K
Median unit price-$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.14%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.39%4.41%
1-year house growth+17.1%estimate+11.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.2%2.4%
Population1,578440

Beverley vs Chiton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Beverley and $990K in Chiton, so Chiton is the cheaper entry point, with Beverley houses about 3% dearer.

On cash flow, Chiton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.14% in Beverley, a gap of 0.66 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.1% in Beverley (an estimate) and +11.4% in Chiton (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Beverley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Beverley and 2.4% in Chiton, so landlords in Beverley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beverley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,578 against 440, roughly 3.6 times the size of Chiton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Chiton for rental income, Chiton for a lower purchase price, Beverley for recent price momentum, Beverley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison