Skip to main content

Birmingham Gardens vs Manyana

Property investment comparison - Birmingham Gardens, NSW 2287 vs Manyana, NSW 2539

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Birmingham Gardens wins 3, Manyana wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBirmingham GardensManyana
Median house price$905K$905K
Median unit price-$695K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.87%
Gross rental yield (units)4.83%4.06%
1-year house growth+9.4%-2.2%
3-year house growth+25.2%+13.4%
Vacancy rate3.0%0.7%
Population2,598670

Birmingham Gardens vs Manyana: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $905K in Birmingham Gardens and $905K in Manyana.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.4% in Birmingham Gardens and -2.2% in Manyana, so recent momentum favours Birmingham Gardens, while Manyana went backwards.

Looking back three years, Birmingham Gardens houses are +25.2% and Manyana houses +13.4%, so Birmingham Gardens has compounded faster than Manyana over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Manyana and 3.0% in Birmingham Gardens, so landlords in Manyana face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Birmingham Gardens is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,598 against 670, roughly 3.9 times the size of Manyana; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Birmingham Gardens for recent price momentum, Manyana for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison