Skip to main content

Birrong vs Gledswood Hills

Property investment comparison - Birrong, NSW 2143 vs Gledswood Hills, NSW 2557

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Birrong wins 3, Gledswood Hills wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBirrongGledswood Hills
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price-$1.9M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.87%3.09%
Gross rental yield (units)3.31%1.98%
1-year house growth+3.0%estimate+11.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%2.2%
Population3,3316,112

Birrong vs Gledswood Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Birrong and $1.4M in Gledswood Hills, so Birrong is the cheaper entry point, with Gledswood Hills houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Gledswood Hills leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.09%, compared with 2.87% in Birrong, a gap of 0.22 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.0% in Birrong (an estimate) and +11.2% in Gledswood Hills (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Gledswood Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Birrong and 2.2% in Gledswood Hills, so landlords in Birrong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gledswood Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,112 against 3,331, larger than Birrong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gledswood Hills for rental income, Birrong for a lower purchase price, Gledswood Hills for recent price momentum, Birrong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison