Black Hill vs Hurstville
Property investment comparison - Black Hill, NSW 2322 vs Hurstville, NSW 2220
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Black Hill wins 3, Hurstville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Black Hill | Hurstville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.2M | $2.2M |
| Median unit price | $525K | $780K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.85% | 4.98% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +4.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +23.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 7.8% | 1.3% |
| Population | 516 | 31,162 |
Black Hill vs Hurstville: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.2M in Black Hill and $2.2M in Hurstville, so Black Hill is the cheaper entry point, with Hurstville houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Black Hill sits at a median of $525K against $780K in Hurstville, which makes Black Hill the more affordable unit market and Hurstville the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Hurstville and 7.8% in Black Hill, so landlords in Hurstville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Hurstville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,162 against 516, roughly 60 times the size of Black Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Black Hill for a lower purchase price, Hurstville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison