Skip to main content

Bonville vs Dunmore

Property investment comparison - Bonville, NSW 2450 vs Dunmore, NSW 2529

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bonville wins 2, Dunmore wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBonvilleDunmore
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$755K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.78%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)4.85%5.44%
1-year house growth+9.0%+10.0%
3-year house growth+13.1%+3.2%
Vacancy rate0.9%5.3%
Population2,939318

Bonville vs Dunmore: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Bonville and $1.1M in Dunmore.

On cash flow, Dunmore leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.78% in Bonville, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.0% in Bonville and +10.0% in Dunmore, so recent momentum favours Dunmore, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bonville houses are +13.1% and Dunmore houses +3.2%, so Bonville has compounded faster than Dunmore over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Bonville and 5.3% in Dunmore, so landlords in Bonville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bonville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,939 against 318, roughly 9 times the size of Dunmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dunmore for rental income, Dunmore for recent price momentum, Bonville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison