Boondall vs Calavos
Property investment comparison - Boondall, QLD 4034 vs Calavos, QLD 4670
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boondall wins 2, Calavos wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Boondall | Calavos |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $845K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.10% | 2.05% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +20.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +51.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Population | 9,603 | 359 |
Boondall vs Calavos: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Boondall and $1.2M in Calavos, so Boondall is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Boondall leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.05% in Calavos, a gap of 1.05 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Calavos and 1.6% in Boondall, so landlords in Calavos face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Boondall is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,603 against 359, roughly 27 times the size of Calavos; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Boondall for rental income, Boondall for a lower purchase price, Calavos for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison