Boorooma vs Willmot
Property investment comparison - Boorooma, NSW 2650 vs Willmot, NSW 2770
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boorooma wins 2, Willmot wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Boorooma | Willmot |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $850K | $850K |
| Median unit price | - | $460K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.12% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.37% | 5.48% |
| 1-year house growth | +13.0% | +4.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +12.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Population | 1,741 | 2,382 |
Boorooma vs Willmot: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Boorooma and $850K in Willmot.
Over the past year house prices moved +13.0% in Boorooma and +4.3% in Willmot (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Boorooma, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Boorooma and 1.4% in Willmot, so landlords in Boorooma face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Willmot is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,382 against 1,741, larger than Boorooma; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Boorooma for recent price momentum, Boorooma for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison