Skip to main content

Boree vs Dorrigo

Property investment comparison - Boree, NSW 2325 vs Dorrigo, NSW 2453

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boree wins 3, Dorrigo wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoreeDorrigo
Median house price$630K$635K
Median unit price$465K$390K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.25%3.81%
Gross rental yield (units)5.09%3.53%
1-year house growth--0.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.0%0.5%
Population931,214

Boree vs Dorrigo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $630K in Boree and $635K in Dorrigo, so Boree is the cheaper entry point, with Dorrigo houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Boree sits at a median of $465K against $390K in Dorrigo, which makes Dorrigo the more affordable unit market and Boree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Boree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.25%, compared with 3.81% in Dorrigo, a gap of 1.44 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Dorrigo and 2.0% in Boree, so landlords in Dorrigo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dorrigo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,214 against 93, roughly 13 times the size of Boree; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Boree for rental income, Boree for a lower purchase price, Dorrigo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison