Skip to main content

Bradbury vs Wadalba

Property investment comparison - Bradbury, NSW 2560 vs Wadalba, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bradbury wins 2, Wadalba wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBradburyWadalba
Median house price$980K$980K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%4.43%
1-year house growth+9.3%+7.0%
3-year house growth+24.2%+13.3%
Vacancy rate1.5%0.7%
Population9,4334,204

Bradbury vs Wadalba: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $980K in Bradbury and $980K in Wadalba.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.3% in Bradbury and +7.0% in Wadalba, so recent momentum favours Bradbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bradbury houses are +24.2% and Wadalba houses +13.3%, so Bradbury has compounded faster than Wadalba over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Wadalba and 1.5% in Bradbury, so landlords in Wadalba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bradbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,433 against 4,204, roughly 2.2 times the size of Wadalba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bradbury for recent price momentum, Wadalba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison