Skip to main content

Broughton Village vs Manly Vale

Property investment comparison - Broughton Village, NSW 2534 vs Manly Vale, NSW 2093

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broughton Village wins 1, Manly Vale wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBroughton VillageManly Vale
Median house price$2.9M$2.9M
Median unit price$945K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.56%2.70%
Gross rental yield (units)3.37%4.10%
1-year house growth--1.0%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%1.6%
Population956,389

Broughton Village vs Manly Vale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.9M in Broughton Village and $2.9M in Manly Vale, so Manly Vale is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Broughton Village sits at a median of $945K against $1.1M in Manly Vale, which makes Broughton Village the more affordable unit market and Manly Vale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Manly Vale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.70%, compared with 1.56% in Broughton Village, a gap of 1.14 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Manly Vale and 1.9% in Broughton Village, so landlords in Manly Vale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Manly Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,389 against 95, roughly 67 times the size of Broughton Village; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Manly Vale for rental income, Manly Vale for a lower purchase price, Manly Vale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison