Skip to main content

Brunkerville vs Stanmore

Property investment comparison - Brunkerville, NSW 2323 vs Stanmore, NSW 2048

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brunkerville wins 3, Stanmore wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrunkervilleStanmore
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$535K$980K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.32%2.45%
Gross rental yield (units)4.86%3.50%
1-year house growth-+5.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.5%1.2%
Population2167,619

Brunkerville vs Stanmore: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Brunkerville and $2.6M in Stanmore, so Stanmore is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Brunkerville sits at a median of $535K against $980K in Stanmore, which makes Brunkerville the more affordable unit market and Stanmore the pricier one.

On cash flow, Stanmore leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.45%, compared with 1.32% in Brunkerville, a gap of 1.13 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Brunkerville and 1.2% in Stanmore, so landlords in Brunkerville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Stanmore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,619 against 216, roughly 35 times the size of Brunkerville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Stanmore for rental income, Stanmore for a lower purchase price, Brunkerville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison