Skip to main content

Brunswick East vs Jan Juc

Property investment comparison - Brunswick East, VIC 3057 vs Jan Juc, VIC 3228

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brunswick East wins 5, Jan Juc wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrunswick EastJan Juc
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$535K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.06%
Gross rental yield (units)5.80%3.74%
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate+0.3%
3-year house growth-+5.5%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.8%
Population13,2794,151

Brunswick East vs Jan Juc: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Brunswick East and $1.4M in Jan Juc, so Brunswick East is the cheaper entry point, with Jan Juc houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Brunswick East leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 3.06% in Jan Juc, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.7% in Brunswick East (an estimate) and +0.3% in Jan Juc, so recent momentum favours Brunswick East, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Brunswick East and 1.8% in Jan Juc, so landlords in Brunswick East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brunswick East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,279 against 4,151, roughly 3.2 times the size of Jan Juc; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brunswick East for rental income, Brunswick East for a lower purchase price, Brunswick East for recent price momentum, Brunswick East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison