Skip to main content

Bundalaguah vs Clarinda

Property investment comparison - Bundalaguah, VIC 3851 vs Clarinda, VIC 3169

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bundalaguah wins 1, Clarinda wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBundalaguahClarinda
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$620K$825K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.32%3.22%
Gross rental yield (units)1.69%-
1-year house growth--3.1%
3-year house growth-+10.5%
Vacancy rate26.3%1.1%
Population2297,441

Bundalaguah vs Clarinda: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Bundalaguah and $1.1M in Clarinda, so Clarinda is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Bundalaguah sits at a median of $620K against $825K in Clarinda, which makes Bundalaguah the more affordable unit market and Clarinda the pricier one.

On cash flow, Clarinda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.22%, compared with 2.32% in Bundalaguah, a gap of 0.90 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Clarinda and 26.3% in Bundalaguah, so landlords in Clarinda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clarinda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,441 against 229, roughly 32 times the size of Bundalaguah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clarinda for rental income, Clarinda for a lower purchase price, Clarinda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison