Bungarribee vs Mount Wilson
Property investment comparison - Bungarribee, NSW 2767 vs Mount Wilson, NSW 2786
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bungarribee wins 2, Mount Wilson wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bungarribee | Mount Wilson |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.5M | $1.5M |
| Median unit price | $815K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.12% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.13% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +4.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +20.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 8.4% |
| Population | 3,177 | 81 |
Bungarribee vs Mount Wilson: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.5M in Bungarribee and $1.5M in Mount Wilson, so Bungarribee is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Wilson houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Bungarribee and 8.4% in Mount Wilson, so landlords in Bungarribee face less competition for tenants.
Bungarribee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,177 against 81, roughly 39 times the size of Mount Wilson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bungarribee for a lower purchase price, Bungarribee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison