Skip to main content

Burekup vs Forrestdale

Property investment comparison - Burekup, WA 6227 vs Forrestdale, WA 6112

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burekup wins 1, Forrestdale wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurekupForrestdale
Median house price$970K$970K
Median unit price$690K$510K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.24%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)5.01%6.16%
1-year house growth+22.9%estimate+20.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate4.3%1.3%
Population7881,027

Burekup vs Forrestdale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $970K in Burekup and $970K in Forrestdale.

For units, Burekup sits at a median of $690K against $510K in Forrestdale, which makes Forrestdale the more affordable unit market and Burekup the pricier one.

On cash flow, Forrestdale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.24% in Burekup, a gap of 0.66 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.9% in Burekup (an estimate) and +20.9% in Forrestdale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Burekup, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Forrestdale and 4.3% in Burekup, so landlords in Forrestdale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Forrestdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 788, larger than Burekup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Forrestdale for rental income, Burekup for recent price momentum, Forrestdale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison