Skip to main content

Burrill Lake vs Manyana

Property investment comparison - Burrill Lake, NSW 2539 vs Manyana, NSW 2539

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burrill Lake wins 2, Manyana wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurrill LakeManyana
Median house price$910K$905K
Median unit price-$695K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.87%
Gross rental yield (units)5.97%4.06%
1-year house growth+5.3%-2.2%
3-year house growth+11.6%+13.4%
Vacancy rate2.0%0.7%
Population1,782670

Burrill Lake vs Manyana: what the numbers say

The median house price is $910K in Burrill Lake and $905K in Manyana, so Manyana is the cheaper entry point, with Burrill Lake houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.3% in Burrill Lake and -2.2% in Manyana, so recent momentum favours Burrill Lake, while Manyana went backwards.

Looking back three years, Burrill Lake houses are +11.6% and Manyana houses +13.4%, so Manyana has compounded faster than Burrill Lake over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Manyana and 2.0% in Burrill Lake, so landlords in Manyana face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Burrill Lake is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,782 against 670, roughly 2.7 times the size of Manyana; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Manyana for a lower purchase price, Burrill Lake for recent price momentum, Manyana for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison