Skip to main content

Burwood East vs Edithvale

Property investment comparison - Burwood East, VIC 3151 vs Edithvale, VIC 3196

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Burwood East wins 2, Edithvale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBurwood EastEdithvale
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$860K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.87%3.02%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.00%
1-year house growth+0.0%+4.0%estimate
3-year house growth+5.4%-
Vacancy rate1.7%1.8%
Population10,6756,276

Burwood East vs Edithvale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Burwood East and $1.3M in Edithvale, so Burwood East is the cheaper entry point, with Edithvale houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Edithvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.02%, compared with 2.87% in Burwood East, a gap of 0.15 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.0% in Burwood East and +4.0% in Edithvale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Edithvale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Burwood East and 1.8% in Edithvale, so landlords in Burwood East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Burwood East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,675 against 6,276, larger than Edithvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Edithvale for rental income, Burwood East for a lower purchase price, Edithvale for recent price momentum, Burwood East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison