Skip to main content

Buttaba vs Wadalba

Property investment comparison - Buttaba, NSW 2283 vs Wadalba, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Buttaba wins 2, Wadalba wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricButtabaWadalba
Median house price$980K$980K
Median unit price$600K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.53%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)4.69%4.43%
1-year house growth+12.4%estimate+7.0%
3-year house growth-+13.3%
Vacancy rate1.4%0.7%
Population1,2044,204

Buttaba vs Wadalba: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $980K in Buttaba and $980K in Wadalba.

On cash flow, Wadalba leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.00%, compared with 3.53% in Buttaba, a gap of 0.47 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.4% in Buttaba (an estimate) and +7.0% in Wadalba, so recent momentum favours Buttaba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Wadalba and 1.4% in Buttaba, so landlords in Wadalba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wadalba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,204 against 1,204, roughly 3.5 times the size of Buttaba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wadalba for rental income, Buttaba for recent price momentum, Wadalba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison