Skip to main content

Byaduk North vs Nagambie

Property investment comparison - Byaduk North, VIC 3300 vs Nagambie, VIC 3608

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Byaduk North wins 2, Nagambie wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricByaduk NorthNagambie
Median house price$640K$640K
Median unit price$310K$510K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.34%4.90%
Gross rental yield (units)4.56%4.98%
1-year house growth-+3.2%
3-year house growth--10.1%
Vacancy rate0.3%1.4%
Population1342,254

Byaduk North vs Nagambie: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $640K in Byaduk North and $640K in Nagambie.

For units, Byaduk North sits at a median of $310K against $510K in Nagambie, which makes Byaduk North the more affordable unit market and Nagambie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Nagambie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 3.34% in Byaduk North, a gap of 1.56 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Byaduk North and 1.4% in Nagambie, so landlords in Byaduk North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Nagambie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,254 against 134, roughly 17 times the size of Byaduk North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Nagambie for rental income, Byaduk North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison