Skip to main content

Cabarita vs Killara

Property investment comparison - Cabarita, NSW 2137 vs Killara, NSW 2071

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cabarita wins 2, Killara wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCabaritaKillara
Median house price$3.9M$3.9M
Median unit price-$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.90%2.03%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth-4.3%estimate-7.1%
3-year house growth--2.6%
Vacancy rate2.8%1.8%
Population1,93310,620

Cabarita vs Killara: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.9M in Cabarita and $3.9M in Killara, so Cabarita is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Killara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.03%, compared with 1.90% in Cabarita, a gap of 0.13 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -4.3% in Cabarita (an estimate) and -7.1% in Killara, so recent momentum favours Cabarita, while Killara went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Killara and 2.8% in Cabarita, so landlords in Killara face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Killara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,620 against 1,933, roughly 5 times the size of Cabarita; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Killara for rental income, Cabarita for a lower purchase price, Cabarita for recent price momentum, Killara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison