Skip to main content

Cabbage Tree Creek vs Cobram

Property investment comparison - Cabbage Tree Creek, VIC 3889 vs Cobram, VIC 3644

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cabbage Tree Creek wins 2, Cobram wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCabbage Tree CreekCobram
Median house price$435K$440K
Median unit price-$330K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.52%5.66%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.52%
1-year house growth--3.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%1.3%
Population526,148

Cabbage Tree Creek vs Cobram: what the numbers say

The median house price is $435K in Cabbage Tree Creek and $440K in Cobram, so Cabbage Tree Creek is the cheaper entry point, with Cobram houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Cobram leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.66%, compared with 4.52% in Cabbage Tree Creek, a gap of 1.14 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Cabbage Tree Creek and 1.3% in Cobram, so landlords in Cabbage Tree Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cobram is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,148 against 52, roughly 118 times the size of Cabbage Tree Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cobram for rental income, Cabbage Tree Creek for a lower purchase price, Cabbage Tree Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison