Skip to main content

Calderwood vs Ingleburn

Property investment comparison - Calderwood, NSW 2527 vs Ingleburn, NSW 2565

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Calderwood wins 5, Ingleburn wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCalderwoodIngleburn
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$720K$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.55%4.20%
1-year house growth+16.5%+10.6%
3-year house growth+22.6%+19.2%
Vacancy rate0.1%1.2%
Population3,01315,264

Calderwood vs Ingleburn: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Calderwood and $1.1M in Ingleburn.

For units, Calderwood sits at a median of $720K against $725K in Ingleburn, which makes Calderwood the more affordable unit market and Ingleburn the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.5% in Calderwood and +10.6% in Ingleburn, so recent momentum favours Calderwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Calderwood houses are +22.6% and Ingleburn houses +19.2%, so Calderwood has compounded faster than Ingleburn over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Calderwood and 1.2% in Ingleburn, so landlords in Calderwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ingleburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,264 against 3,013, roughly 5 times the size of Calderwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Calderwood for recent price momentum, Calderwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison