Skip to main content

Campbelltown vs Narara

Property investment comparison - Campbelltown, NSW 2560 vs Narara, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Campbelltown wins 4, Narara wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCampbelltownNarara
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$590K$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.17%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.85%4.31%
1-year house growth+9.9%+7.6%
3-year house growth+16.9%+0.0%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.9%
Population16,5778,471

Campbelltown vs Narara: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Campbelltown and $1.0M in Narara.

For units, Campbelltown sits at a median of $590K against $730K in Narara, which makes Campbelltown the more affordable unit market and Narara the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.9% in Campbelltown and +7.6% in Narara, so recent momentum favours Campbelltown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Campbelltown houses are +16.9% and Narara houses +0.0%, so Campbelltown has compounded faster than Narara over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Narara and 1.8% in Campbelltown, so landlords in Narara face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Campbelltown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,577 against 8,471, larger than Narara; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Campbelltown for recent price momentum, Narara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Campbelltown vs Narara: Suburb Comparison 2026