Skip to main content

Cape Gloucester vs Waterford

Property investment comparison - Cape Gloucester, QLD 4800 vs Waterford, QLD 4133

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cape Gloucester wins 0, Waterford wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCape GloucesterWaterford
Median house price$920K$920K
Median unit price$790K$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.20%
1-year house growth-+18.7%
3-year house growth-+53.8%
Vacancy rate1.1%0.9%
Population855,796

Cape Gloucester vs Waterford: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $920K in Cape Gloucester and $920K in Waterford.

For units, Cape Gloucester sits at a median of $790K against $670K in Waterford, which makes Waterford the more affordable unit market and Cape Gloucester the pricier one.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Waterford and 1.1% in Cape Gloucester, so landlords in Waterford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Waterford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,796 against 85, roughly 68 times the size of Cape Gloucester; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Waterford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison