Skip to main content

Charmhaven vs Gorokan

Property investment comparison - Charmhaven, NSW 2263 vs Gorokan, NSW 2263

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Charmhaven wins 2, Gorokan wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCharmhavenGorokan
Median house price$850K$850K
Median unit price-$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%3.72%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%4.55%
1-year house growth+9.6%+13.1%
3-year house growth+23.5%+23.2%
Vacancy rate2.9%0.8%
Population2,5018,624

Charmhaven vs Gorokan: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Charmhaven and $850K in Gorokan.

On cash flow, Charmhaven leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.72% in Gorokan, a gap of 0.18 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.6% in Charmhaven and +13.1% in Gorokan, so recent momentum favours Gorokan, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Charmhaven houses are +23.5% and Gorokan houses +23.2%, so Charmhaven has compounded faster than Gorokan over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Gorokan and 2.9% in Charmhaven, so landlords in Gorokan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gorokan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,624 against 2,501, roughly 3.4 times the size of Charmhaven; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Charmhaven for rental income, Gorokan for recent price momentum, Gorokan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison