Skip to main content

Claremont Meadows vs Lisarow

Property investment comparison - Claremont Meadows, NSW 2747 vs Lisarow, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Claremont Meadows wins 1, Lisarow wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClaremont MeadowsLisarow
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$900K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.99%3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)3.95%4.60%
1-year house growth+3.2%+9.2%
3-year house growth+17.5%+15.1%
Vacancy rate2.2%1.2%
Population5,1775,299

Claremont Meadows vs Lisarow: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Claremont Meadows and $1.2M in Lisarow.

On cash flow, Lisarow leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.38%, compared with 2.99% in Claremont Meadows, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.2% in Claremont Meadows and +9.2% in Lisarow, so recent momentum favours Lisarow, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Claremont Meadows houses are +17.5% and Lisarow houses +15.1%, so Claremont Meadows has compounded faster than Lisarow over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Lisarow and 2.2% in Claremont Meadows, so landlords in Lisarow face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lisarow is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,299 against 5,177, larger than Claremont Meadows; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lisarow for rental income, Lisarow for recent price momentum, Lisarow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison