Skip to main content

Claremont Meadows vs Wendoree Park

Property investment comparison - Claremont Meadows, NSW 2747 vs Wendoree Park, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Claremont Meadows wins 0, Wendoree Park wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricClaremont MeadowsWendoree Park
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%3.27%
Gross rental yield (units)4.38%5.79%
1-year house growth+5.0%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%0.7%
Population5,177131

Claremont Meadows vs Wendoree Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Claremont Meadows and $1.2M in Wendoree Park, so Wendoree Park is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Wendoree Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.27%, compared with 3.00% in Claremont Meadows, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Wendoree Park and 1.5% in Claremont Meadows, so landlords in Wendoree Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Claremont Meadows is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,177 against 131, roughly 40 times the size of Wendoree Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wendoree Park for rental income, Wendoree Park for a lower purchase price, Wendoree Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison