Coomealla vs West Tamworth
Property investment comparison - Coomealla, NSW 2717 vs West Tamworth, NSW 2340
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coomealla wins 0, West Tamworth wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Coomealla | West Tamworth |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $500K | $500K |
| Median unit price | - | $360K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.96% | 4.69% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +45.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Population | 748 | 5,471 |
Coomealla vs West Tamworth: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $500K in Coomealla and $500K in West Tamworth.
On cash flow, West Tamworth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.69%, compared with 2.96% in Coomealla, a gap of 1.73 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.0%.
West Tamworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,471 against 748, roughly 7 times the size of Coomealla; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: West Tamworth for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison