Skip to main content

Coomera vs Windaroo

Property investment comparison - Coomera, QLD 4209 vs Windaroo, QLD 4207

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coomera wins 3, Windaroo wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoomeraWindaroo
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$800K$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.50%3.68%
1-year house growth+16.8%+18.8%
3-year house growth+43.8%+41.0%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.6%
Population20,2252,771

Coomera vs Windaroo: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Coomera and $1.1M in Windaroo.

For units, Coomera sits at a median of $800K against $745K in Windaroo, which makes Windaroo the more affordable unit market and Coomera the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.8% in Coomera and +18.8% in Windaroo, so recent momentum favours Windaroo, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Coomera houses are +43.8% and Windaroo houses +41.0%, so Coomera has compounded faster than Windaroo over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Coomera and 1.6% in Windaroo, so landlords in Coomera face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Coomera is the bigger suburb, with a population of 20,225 against 2,771, roughly 7 times the size of Windaroo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Windaroo for recent price momentum, Coomera for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison