Skip to main content

Cringila vs Yass

Property investment comparison - Cringila, NSW 2502 vs Yass, NSW 2582

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cringila wins 2, Yass wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCringilaYass
Median house price$780K$780K
Median unit price$565K$640K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.88%-
1-year house growth+7.7%estimate+6.1%
3-year house growth-+7.0%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.7%
Population2,1566,763

Cringila vs Yass: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Cringila and $780K in Yass.

For units, Cringila sits at a median of $565K against $640K in Yass, which makes Cringila the more affordable unit market and Yass the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.7% in Cringila (an estimate) and +6.1% in Yass, so recent momentum favours Cringila, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Yass and 1.6% in Cringila, so landlords in Yass face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yass is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,763 against 2,156, roughly 3.1 times the size of Cringila; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cringila for recent price momentum, Yass for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison