Skip to main content

Daylesford vs Rosebud

Property investment comparison - Daylesford, VIC 3460 vs Rosebud, VIC 3939

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Daylesford wins 1, Rosebud wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDaylesfordRosebud
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price-$675K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.57%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.05%4.43%
1-year house growth-2.2%+1.4%
3-year house growth-11.0%+6.7%
Vacancy rate0.5%2.1%
Population2,78114,381

Daylesford vs Rosebud: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Daylesford and $800K in Rosebud.

Over the past year house prices moved -2.2% in Daylesford and +1.4% in Rosebud, so recent momentum favours Rosebud, while Daylesford went backwards.

Looking back three years, Daylesford houses are -11.0% and Rosebud houses +6.7%, so Rosebud has compounded faster than Daylesford over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Daylesford and 2.1% in Rosebud, so landlords in Daylesford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rosebud is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,381 against 2,781, roughly 5 times the size of Daylesford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rosebud for recent price momentum, Daylesford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison