Dinmore vs Earlville
Property investment comparison - Dinmore, QLD 4303 vs Earlville, QLD 4870
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dinmore wins 2, Earlville wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dinmore | Earlville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $745K | $745K |
| Median unit price | $560K | $370K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.00% | 5.14% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.90% | 6.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.3% |
| 3-year house growth | +77.8% | +31.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Population | 1,109 | 4,200 |
Dinmore vs Earlville: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $745K in Dinmore and $745K in Earlville.
For units, Dinmore sits at a median of $560K against $370K in Earlville, which makes Earlville the more affordable unit market and Dinmore the pricier one.
On cash flow, Earlville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.14%, compared with 4.00% in Dinmore, a gap of 1.14 percentage points.
Looking back three years, Dinmore houses are +77.8% and Earlville houses +31.2%, so Dinmore has compounded faster than Earlville over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.4%.
Earlville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,109, roughly 3.8 times the size of Dinmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Earlville for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison