Skip to main content

Dinmore vs Manunda

Property investment comparison - Dinmore, QLD 4303 vs Manunda, QLD 4870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dinmore wins 1, Manunda wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDinmoreManunda
Median house price$745K$745K
Median unit price$560K$355K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%4.76%
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%6.41%
1-year house growth-+21.3%estimate
3-year house growth+77.8%-
Vacancy rate0.4%0.6%
Population1,1095,191

Dinmore vs Manunda: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $745K in Dinmore and $745K in Manunda.

For units, Dinmore sits at a median of $560K against $355K in Manunda, which makes Manunda the more affordable unit market and Dinmore the pricier one.

On cash flow, Manunda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.76%, compared with 4.00% in Dinmore, a gap of 0.76 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Dinmore and 0.6% in Manunda, so landlords in Dinmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Manunda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,191 against 1,109, roughly 4.7 times the size of Dinmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Manunda for rental income, Dinmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison