Skip to main content

Duncraig vs Jandakot

Property investment comparison - Duncraig, WA 6023 vs Jandakot, WA 6164

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Duncraig wins 1, Jandakot wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDuncraigJandakot
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$850K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%3.45%
Gross rental yield (units)4.47%-
1-year house growth+15.8%-
3-year house growth+59.3%+88.6%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.7%
Population15,9822,533

Duncraig vs Jandakot: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Duncraig and $1.5M in Jandakot, so Jandakot is the cheaper entry point, with Duncraig houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Jandakot leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.45%, compared with 3.10% in Duncraig, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Duncraig houses are +59.3% and Jandakot houses +88.6%, so Jandakot has compounded faster than Duncraig over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Duncraig and 1.7% in Jandakot, so landlords in Duncraig face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Duncraig is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,982 against 2,533, roughly 6 times the size of Jandakot; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Jandakot for rental income, Jandakot for a lower purchase price, Duncraig for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison